Churchill, Hirohito, and Goebells are all three very influential WWII figures whose words were so profound, we are still reading and analyzing them today. All three men use hyperboles to advance their arguments and gain the support and/or loyalty of their people.
All of their exaggerations use the method of rallying people to support their cause because the fate of the world or the future of humankind rests in their fight. Goebells uses this tactic often in his speech, as his claims usually contain no support and are in no way truthful. His figurative language rouses his audience, because who wouldn't support a war that "overshadows all previous human and historical experience"(3)? Although he is completely off target, his use of hyperbole creates no choice but for his listeners to agree with him. Hirohito, on the other hand, is not rallying people to fight as Goebells is, uses a hyperbole to covertly convince his subjects of something, and that is, that "all" have turned against Japanese interests. Considering this was after the atom bomb, the Japanese would very likely believe this idea, especially coming from their divine ruler, that the whole world is against them, however, Hirohito does this in such a simple and unknowingly effective way that one would not even recognize it.
Churchill is much more similar to Goebells in that his overstatements are explicit and dramatic. In an attempt to gain support, he informs them of the "monstrous tyranny" that needs to be stopped, and reminds that they are fighting "one of the greatest battles in history." By doing this, his tactics closely resemble those of Goebells in that both are using extreme, direct, forceful and aggressive language and statements to gain the support they need. Their hyperboles are undoubtably pathos driven, as Churchill describes the enemy as the devil himself, while Goebells believes the war to be the biggest event to humankind ever.
Furthermore, the use of hyperboles in all three speeches effectively aid the speakers in getting their claims across and fulfilling the intention of their speech. Althought Goebells and Churchill are looking to gain support while Hitrohito seeks to keep his people loyal, and Goebells and Churchill's over statements are more forceful when Hirohitos are covert, they all demonstrate the idea of hyperboles and how they are an essential part to a speech, and when well crafted, can push people into action without them ever knowing.
Hey Olivia Great Job!
ReplyDeleteOverall I thought that your blog was great. You did use a lot of quotes and specific details from all of the speeches in order to support your claims. I just think that you should talk about the context of all of the speeches in the introduction and tie that into your thesis of hyperboles. Also I think you may want to widen your focus from overstatement to maybe the intention of their speeches, which you did mention but I think expanding on it more would help in the intro. Overall though you did great. There were several grammatical errors, but they were very few and minor. Great Job!
- Joe
Hello Oliva!
ReplyDeleteSo this was a very focused blog. You had your point, you proved it, and you wrapped it up all very concisely and it flowed well. I will have to agree with Joe in saying perhaps you may want to widen your statement. You proved that each leader used hyper boles and in the conclusion you gave a little more meaning to this ( they used to to help get their claim across) but it would be more interesting if you explored how it helped get their claim across or something in addition to the hyperbole. I know word limits are hard good luck and great blog!
Olivia, I agree with Joe and Charlie--this a concise, articulate blog that focuses on a really small but crucial rhetorical device all three speakers use. I agree, too, that the blog could benefit from a little more focus on "so what?" You mention it in the conclusion, but push that analysis even further. Must all leaders use hyperbole to rally and unify? Is hyperbole in some instances more justifiable than in others? Etc....
ReplyDelete